Skip to content

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

RalfJung and others added 11 commits September 8, 2024 08:45
`rustc_resolve` allocates many things in `ResolverArenas`. The lifetime
used for references into the arena is mostly `'a`, and sometimes `'b`.

This commit changes it to `'ra`, which is much more descriptive. The
commit also changes the order of lifetimes on a couple of structs so
that '`ra` is second last, before `'tcx`, and does other minor
renamings such as `'r` to `'a`.
some const cleanup: remove unnecessary attributes, add const-hack indications

I learned that we use `FIXME(const-hack)` on top of the "const-hack" label. That seems much better since it marks the right place in the code and moves around with the code. So I went through the PRs with that label and added appropriate FIXMEs in the code. IMO this means we can then remove the label -- Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval.`

I also noticed some const stability attributes that don't do anything useful, and removed them.

r? `@fee1-dead`
…chenkov

Introduce `'ra` lifetime name.

`rustc_resolve` allocates many things in `ResolverArenas`. The lifetime used for references into the arena is mostly `'a`, and sometimes `'b`.

This commit changes it to `'rslv`, which is much more descriptive. The commit also changes the order of lifetimes on a couple of structs so that '`rslv` is second last, before `'tcx`, and does other minor renamings such as `'r` to `'a`.

r? `@petrochenkov`
cc `@oli-obk`
coverage: Simplify creation of sum counters

A small and self-contained improvement, extracted from some larger changes that I'm still working on.

Ultimately I want to avoid creating these sum counter-expressions in some cases (in favour of just adding physical counters directly to the nodes we care about), so a good incremental move towards that is splitting the “gather edge counters” step out from the ”build a sum of those counters” step.

Creating an extra intermediate vector should have negligible cost (and coverage isn't exercised by the benchmark suite anyway). The removed logging is redundant with the `#[instrument(..)]` logging we already have on the underlying method calls.
…mpiler-errors

more eagerly discard constraints on overflow

We always discard the results of overflowing goals inside of the trait solver. We previously did so when instantiating the response in `evaluate_goal`. Canonicalizing results only to later discard them is also  inefficient 🤷

It's simpler and nicer to debug to eagerly discard constraints inside of the query itself.

r? `@compiler-errors`
@rustbot rustbot added O-windows Operating system: Windows S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Sep 12, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Sep 12, 2024
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-4fe7m0x branch January 25, 2025 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-windows Operating system: Windows rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants